Dramatis Persona
Comparative commentary by David Jasper
The infamous biblical story of Samson and Delilah is limited to Judges 16:4–20. It is preceded by the brief episode with a prostitute suggestive of Samson’s weakness for women (this first Gazite woman contrasting with the business-like Delilah). The story is told with folkloric simplicity and repetitions, giving the barest materials for the rich traditions that have grown up around it.
Written biblical commentaries (as distinct from visual explorations of the episode) tend to focus more on Samson as the God-devoted Nazarite, for whom ‘the appeal of Philistine women [is his] fatal flaw’ (Niditch 2001: 187). The name Delilah (Hebrew dĕlîlâ) possibly relates to ‘loose hair’ or ‘flirtatiousness’, but also plays on the term for ‘night’ (layĕlâ).
In a tradition in art that goes back at least to the sculptural work of Nicola and Giovanni Pisano on the Perugia fountain (1278) and up to contemporary filmic depictions, the sparely-told biblical narrative of Judges 16 has given rise to interpretations of the story that are both violent and erotic. Many of these artistic responses have taken us far from the biblical text and its religious themes and allusions.
In the free development of the scriptural story, Samson and Delilah have given artists (almost exclusively male artists) opportunities to portray a muscular male physique and a beautiful, often half-naked woman (and patrons the opportunity to own such depictions). And this almost entirely male tradition of art has sexualized the narrative from the brief suggestion of verse 4, which records Samson’s falling in love with Delilah.
Such fascinations on the part of artists and patrons may, however, commit in varying degrees the sin of Samson himself, in making Delilah an object of fantasy, sexualized as lover or exotic vamp. As the narrative becomes eroticized, the politics and theology of Judges are forgotten, and art falls into the very trap that is set for Samson (which is to forget God—as a consequence of which ‘the LORD … left him’ (v.20)).
Our three paintings show three possible responses to the story told in Judges 16. All neglect both the traditional folk motifs and the political–theological concerns of the story, though each is richly creative.
Anthony van Dyck’s painting portrays a wholly fictional love story, a romanticized theme often found in baroque art and repeated up to Cecil B. de Mille’s classic film Samson and Delilah (1949) in which Delilah, following her heart, sacrifices herself in the temple with Samson (Exum 1996: 235).
Solomon Joseph Solomon’s text-book The Practice of Oil Painting and of Drawing (1914), and his freedom of interpretation of the text in his painting of the scene, suggest that he was probably more interested in the aesthetics of the human body than the biblical story. Nevertheless, Solomon’s Delilah seems at one level to illustrate surprisingly well the description of her in the almost contemporaneous The Woman’s Bible (1898) as manifesting ‘the treacherous, the sinister, the sensuous side of woman’ (Stanton 2003: 34). The Woman’s Bible as a whole sought to challenge dominant models of biblical patriarchy, so it is perhaps an ironic twist that Solomon’s louche sensationalism and Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s work seem to find something in common in their treatment of Delilah. She becomes simultaneously the object of the male artist’s gaze and of a proto-feminist dismissal of her sensuality.
Of the three works, Rembrandt van Rijn’s is exceptional in its lack of interest in the erotic possibilities of the story. He also offers the closest reading of the text. There is a heightened focus on biblical detail as Rembrandt portrays the violence being perpetrated on Samson, while Delilah is a figure already moving into the background, leaving the scene to the men as they deal with the fallen hero. In Mieke Bal’s words, ‘wicked-by-nature woman is thus denied participation in the narrative events’ (1987: 51).
Rembrandt perhaps has a more developed awareness that Delilah’s action will not be the last word. In 16:1–3 Samson had slept with a prostitute in Gaza while the Gazites lay in wait for him, but even in his weakness for women he outsmarted them, taking the city by surprise at midnight. Here, in Judges 16:22, we are told that his hair begins to grow as soon as it is shaved. Delilah’s ruse works, but it works finally to the demise of the Philistines and their temple. And by this time she will have disappeared altogether from the biblical narrative.
References
Bal, Mieke. 1987. Lethal Love: Feminist Literary Readings of Biblical Live Stories (Bloomington: Indiana University Press)
———1990. ‘Dealing/With/Women: Daughters in the Book of Judges’, in The Book and the Text: The Bible and Literary Theory, ed. by Regina M. Schwartz (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 16–39
Niditch, Susan. 2001. ‘Judges’, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, ed. by John Barton and John Muddiman (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 176–91
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady. [1898] 2003. The Woman’s Bible: A Classic Feminist Perspective (Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications)