John 4:43–54
Jesus Heals an Official’s Son
Works of art by Anton Wierix II, Bernardino Passeri, Rodolpho Amoedo and Unknown Mughal artist
Anton Wierix II, after Bernardino Passeri
The Imprisonment of a Son of the Royal Officer, plate 37 from P. Jeronimo Nadal, Evangelicae Historiea Imagines, 1593, Engraving, 228 x 140 mm, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco; Achenbach Foundation for Graphic Arts, 1963.30.14846, Courtesy of the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco; Photo: Jorge Bachmann
A Higher Authority
Commentary by Rodolfo Galvan Estrada III
When the official came before Jesus and asked him to return to Capernaum to heal his son, was he alone? John’s Gospel does not mention anyone accompanying the official at that moment. It is only later, while the official is on his way home that he meets his servants who inform him that his son has been healed (4:51–52).
Anton Wierix, a sixteenth-century Flemish artist, was part of a family that produced thousands of engravings. This print was created during a time when images and text were being combined in new ways to ‘create an effect more powerful than that of either single component’ (Stronks 210: 220). The pairing of words with images allowed biblical subject matter to be communicated with an impact that neither the textual nor the visual could achieve on its own.
After 1626, Wierix’s engravings and many others were adapted into book form and accompanied with text, identified with the alphabetic letters, to aid in the interpretation of various biblical scenes (Enenkel 2018: 227).
Wierix’s engraving captures the entire episode in a single image, allowing us visually to identify the cities, people, dialogue, and plot. Further away in the background of the composition is the conclusion of this story where the royal official meets his servants who inform him of his son’s recovery.
Although John’s Gospel does not mention any entourage, Wierix’s depiction shows the official with a multitude of servants and his cavalry. They are dressed in fine clothing and convey a sense of authority. The royal official has a sword visible on his hip. The presence of these figures standing behind the royal official highlights the contrast between his authority to command and Jesus’s divine authority to heal.
Though the royal official holds the sword, it is really Jesus who has the power over life and death.
References
Enenkel, Karl A.E., and Christine Göttler. 2018. Solitudo: Spaces, Places, and Times of Solitude in Late Medieval and Early Modern Cultures (Leiden: Brill)
Stronks, Els. 2010. ‘Literature and the Shaping of Religious Identities: The Case of the Protestant Religious Emblem in the Dutch Republic’, History of Religions 49.3: 219–53
Rodolpho Amoêdo
Study for "Jesus em Cafarnaum", 1885, Oil on canvas, 78 x 63 cm, Pinacoteca de São Paolo; Collection of the Pinacoteca de São Paulo. Purchased by the Governo do Estado de São Paulo, 1950, PINA01435, Photo: Isabella Matheus
Cometh the Man
Commentary by Rodolfo Galvan Estrada III
As Jesus travelled from town to town, we do not know how many were in need of a miracle. We are left to wonder about those he might have passed by as well as those he engaged with; those who go unrecorded in the Gospels as well as those whose healings are narrated.
One possible scenario is depicted by Rodolpho Amoêdo, a Brazilian artist of the late nineteenth century, in a painting entitled Jesus em Cafarnaum, completed at the Julian Academy in Paris (1885). Known for his ‘soft and misty’ style of colouration, Amoêdo blurs most of the faces in the scene, except for the man who is lying on the crowded pathway (Braz-Botelho 2015: 37). Amoêdo’s painting foregrounds this young man, his head turned away from Jesus. A woman, perhaps his mother, kneels behind him, extending her arm toward Jesus in an attempt to draw attention to her son.
At the corner of the street, two men stand together, holding each other with a sense of anticipation, as though hoping that Jesus will walk by and see their need.
Was it on one of his visits to Capernaum (e.g. John 2:12), on a street like this one, that Jesus was first seen by the official who would later approach him? We cannot be sure.
Nonetheless, the man on the ground and the people around him are depicted with the greatest clarity and emphasis. The painting presents a poignant scene of the afflicted, with their families the only ones able to plead on their behalf.
Jesus descends some stairs in the narrow street, but it is unclear where his focus is directed. He appears not to be paying attention to the person kneeling immediately in front of him and grasping his arm, and it is uncertain whether he has noticed the young man who lies further ahead of him.
Amoêdo’s painting deliberately blurs Jesus’s face, creating ambiguity about whether Jesus is approaching the young man or about to walk past him. We are left more certain of the intentions of those who are petitioning him than of his own.
References
Braz-Botelho, Marilia. 2015. Le peintre brésilien Rodolpho Amoêdo (1857–1941) et l’expérience de la peinture française: académisme ou innovation? (Unpublished PhD thesis, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne-Paris)
Unknown Mughal artist
Jesus Heals the Nobleman's Son in Capernaum, from a Mirror of Holiness (Mir’at al-quds) of Father Jerome Xavier, 1602–04, Gum tempera, ink, and gold on paper, 262 x 155 mm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, OH; John L. Severance Fund, 2005.145.70.a, Cleveland Art Museum
Angels in the Eaves
Commentary by Rodolfo Galvan Estrada III
‘Your son will live’ (John 4:50). These words of Jesus brought profound comfort to a deeply distressed father.
In the Gospel account, the father (an ‘official’) has travelled from Capernaum to Cana upon hearing that Jesus has recently arrived there. When he finds Jesus, he urgently begs Him to come and heal his dying son. Instead of going with him, Jesus sends the father away and simply affirms that his son will live. The father believed in Jesus’s words, and immediately departed home.
Although John’s Gospel provides few details about the father’s arrival at his home, this illumination imagines the scene. It is from a life of Christ by Jerome Xavier, a Spanish Jesuit missionary to the Mughal court of the Emperor Akbar (sixteenth–seventeenth centuries). The Emperor had a deep interest in Christianity and hosted Xavier as a guest (Carvalho 2012: 1). He commissioned from Xavier a manuscript about Christ called MirʼāT Al-Quds (Mirror of Holiness) and this illumination comes from one of three extant illustrated copies (ibid).
The illumination portrays the father at his home, watching over his son who is lying on the floor. The mother is also nearby, gently gazing at her son with an outstretched arm, as if to comfort him.
Downstairs, on the ground floor of the home, several servants remain busy with household tasks. They may not be aware of the full extent of the son’s miraculous recovery, but they are eager to serve (Carvalho 2012: 108–09). The painting also features a woman at the door, ready to receive another visitor.
While the Gospel story does not detail the scene at the father’s home, this painting visually depicts the overwhelming relief and astonishment of the moment. This miracle, performed by Jesus from a distance, was understood only by the father, who realized that his son’s recovery was due to Jesus’s pronouncement that he would live.
However, the most striking elements of the portrait are the angels just discernible within the arches supporting the roof of the home. These hidden angels evoke a sense of the unseen heavenly presence of God. In some sense, they also reflect the hidden nature of Jesus’s miracle. But as viewers of this artwork, we, like the readers of John’s Gospel, are given privileged access to what only the father knew at the time: that God was powerfully at work in this healing miracle.
References
Carvalho, Pedro de Moura, and W. M. Thackston. 2012. MirʼāT Al-Quds : A Life of Christ for Emperor Akbar (Leiden: Brill)
Anton Wierix II, after Bernardino Passeri :
The Imprisonment of a Son of the Royal Officer, plate 37 from P. Jeronimo Nadal, Evangelicae Historiea Imagines, 1593 , Engraving
Rodolpho Amoêdo :
Study for "Jesus em Cafarnaum", 1885 , Oil on canvas
Unknown Mughal artist :
Jesus Heals the Nobleman's Son in Capernaum, from a Mirror of Holiness (Mir’at al-quds) of Father Jerome Xavier, 1602–04 , Gum tempera, ink, and gold on paper
Not Taking No for an Answer
Comparative commentary by Rodolfo Galvan Estrada III
In John’s Gospel, Jesus is always on the move. From one city or town to another, his teachings and miracles captivate people, and interest in him grows.
After Jesus’s visit to Samaria (4:4–42), he arrives in Galilee where he is greeted with enthusiasm on account of his miracle-working abilities (v.45).
Miracles in John’s Gospel are labelled as ‘signs’ (sēmeia) which D. A. Carson describes as ‘significant displays of power that point beyond themselves to the deeper realities that could be perceived with the eyes of faith’ (Carson 1991: 175). Some in Galilee had witnessed Jesus’s miracles in Jerusalem during the Passover festival (2:23). Jesus had gained some newfound fame. Everyone seemed to know that he was able to perform miracles.
He may have been uncomfortable with this attention, and his return to Galilee from Judaea (4:46) perhaps indicates a desire to avoid the spotlight. Yet, as he returns to Cana, his fame follows him, and his healing powers are sought.
What would it have looked like to see Jesus, a miracle-worker, passing through a city or town? Would people try to stop him and ask for help? Would they stand in the distance and simply marvel at his presence and extraordinary abilities?
Rodolpho Amoêdo’s portrait of Jesus walking through a crowded street in Capernaum provides a possible vivid scenario. Amoêdo enables us to imagine both the response and interest that the public had in Jesus. The halo around Jesus’s head and his white robes distinguish Jesus from all others; they are like outwards manifestations of his power. As Jesus walked through Capernaum, he would possibly have passed by those who were suffering, in need of a miracle, or who had a request on behalf of others. There was something different about Jesus—but would anyone dare to ask?
Somehow and in some way, a royal official from Capernaum hears about Jesus and his ability to do extraordinary miracles. This royal official was probably associated with Herod’s court (Morris 1995: 256). Although he had missed Jesus or was too uncomfortable to ask for help when Jesus was in Capernaum on an earlier occasion (John 2:12), his son was now on the verge of dying and there was nothing that he could do but find Jesus wherever he might be.
When he finds Jesus in Cana, he begs him to return with him to Capernaum and heal his son (v.47). Jesus, however, does not want to leave, and retorts, ‘unless you people see signs and wonders, you will never believe’ (v.48). The royal official does not take this response as a definitive ‘no’. And again, he begs Jesus to come back with him before his son dies. Then Jesus states, ‘Go, your son will live’ (v.50).
Anton Wierix’s engraving captures the encounter and dialogue between Jesus and the royal official. His depiction showcases the authority and power of the official, a man surrounded by many servants and their horses. This entourage visually communicates the official’s privileged status. However, the need for a miracle brings any person of high status to humility. The engraving draws out this contrast. Despite the royal official's impressive number of servants dressed in fine clothing, Jesus stands taller, though surrounded by his simply dressed disciples. Overall, it is Jesus who has authority over life and death and pronounces that the official’s son will live.
And so, the official believes in Jesus’s words and departs with his servants. After about a day’s journey, other servants meet him and provide news that his son has recovered (vv.51–52). Following this announcement, John’s Gospel no longer calls the man a ‘royal official’. Instead, he is a ‘father’ who has realized that it is Jesus who has healed his son (v.53).
It is in the unknown Mughal artist's illustration of this scene that the father’s relief and affection for his son is displayed. Perhaps the father had not yet told anyone about his dialogue with Jesus but wanted to see for himself that his son was indeed alive. The artist presents the father, kneeling near his son, holding a book, and possibly ready to retell his encounter with Jesus and his role in providing this miracle.
By the end of the story in John’s Gospel, the father reaffirms his belief in Jesus, but we also see that his faith has grown. There is a progression from initially believing in Jesus’s words (v.50), to believing again as a result of seeing the miraculous recovery of his son (v.53).
This ‘sign’ not only brought life to his son, but it also led the father and his entire household to faith (v.53). As Leon Morris remarks, ‘[t]he “sign” transformed his faith into a greater faith’ (Morris 1995: 259).
References
Carson, D. A. 1991. The Gospel according to John, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans)
Morris, Leon. 1995. The Gospel according to John, The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans)
Commentaries by Rodolfo Galvan Estrada III