Ephesians 6:10–24
The Armour of God
The Arms of Christ
Commentary by Frances Rothwell Hughes
A strange constellation of objects floats in the flattened space around Christ’s crucified body: hammer and nails; discarded dice; a bloodied dagger; flails; a classical column bound with rope; a crowing rooster; disembodied hands—some furtively exchanging coins, others clasped together in prayer or guilty evasion.
These untethered symbols are the Arma Christi, the arms of Christ, a medieval pictorial tradition in which the story of Christ’s Passion is distilled into an array of iconic motifs, rather like a series of deeply loaded, devotional emojis.
But this is a paradoxical armoury, featuring ‘weapons’ of limited use in battle. Instead, Christ’s arsenal is stocked with all the objects that contributed to his own torture and persecution. The central item is the cross of the crucifixion, on which he was killed. The daggers, swords, flails, and nails are not readied for physical combat against Christ’s enemies, but rather glisten with his own blood. Little vignettes are displayed like war trophies, but instead of celebrating moments of triumph, they represent instances of defeat, such as Judas’s kiss of betrayal and Pontius Pilate washing his hands. Like the ‘Armour of God’ described in Ephesians 6:10–17, the arms of Christ are metaphorical, readied to strengthen one’s internal resolve in spiritual, not physical, warfare.
Christ’s sacrifice subverts earthly notions of power and might by defeating death through love, forgiveness, and faith. Viewers of Roberto Oderisi’s devotional painting could contemplate each symbol of the Passion as a reminder of Christ’s spiritual endurance in the face of torture and execution, thus fortifying themselves through prayer.
Similarly, Ephesians culminates in a rousing call for its addressees to stand firm in their faith, girded-up internally by the immaterial word of God rather than the material arms of earthly combat.
References
Cooper, Lisa H., and Andrea Denny-Brown (eds). 2014. The Arma Christi in Medieval and Early Modern Material Culture. With a critical edition of ‘O Vernicle’ (Farnham: Ashgate)
Stand Firm
Commentary by Frances Rothwell Hughes
This is a photograph documenting a performance by activists protecting the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Reservation from the threat of the Dakota Access Pipeline, an oil transportation system intended to cut across sacred landscapes and waterways. The performers are brandishing mirrored shields designed by the Indigenous artist Cannupa Hanska Luger to protect the protestors from the police and the forces behind the DAPL.
The idea of the mirrored shield may be traced back to antiquity, with the epic hero Perseus defeating the Medusa by deflecting her deadly stare. Luger’s Mirror Shield Project uses the same method of combat in poetic form, by reflecting the symbolic violence of the authorities back at themselves (Lee 2023: 185–86). The shields are tools of non-violent resistance, allowing their bearers to stand firm, armed with truth, righteousness, and peace.
The language in Ephesians 6 encourages the listener ‘to stand’ against the ‘wiles of the Devil’. This echoes tropes in ancient Greek literature in which ‘standing firm’ with defensive arms was associated with virtuous strength, whilst cunning and airborne attacks were considered tools of devilish warfare (Asher 2011: 732). Mirror Shield Project conveys similar rhetorical ideals, protecting the protestors from police surveillance planes, rubber bullets, and water cannons, while using a device that simply reveals things as they are, truthfully and honestly.
The mirrored shields create an ‘armour of light’ (Romans 13:12), prompting all viewers (including us) to reflect on our implicit role in struggles over God’s creation, both at Standing Rock and within humanity’s ongoing attempts to colonize nature. Ephesians 6:10–20 also asks its readers to re-frame any localised conflict within a much greater cosmic war against the forces of darkness.
Keeping the eternal faith sometimes means losing the temporal battle; the Dakota Access Pipeline has been operational since Spring 2017.
References
Asher, Jeffrey R. 2011. ‘An Unworthy Foe: Heroic Ἔθη, Trickery, and an Insult in Ephesians 6:11’, Journal of Biblical Literature, 130.4: 729–48 muse.jhu.edu/article/465775
Bradnock, Lucy. 2023. ‘Art History and the Landscape of Crisis’, Art History, 46.1: 8–11
Lee, Robyn. 2023. ‘Art, Affect, and Social Media in the “No Dakota Access Pipeline” Movement’, Theory, Culture, & Society, 40.7–8: 179–92
The Helmet of Salvation
Commentary by Frances Rothwell Hughes
The original recipients of Ephesians would probably have imagined a Roman soldier’s accoutrements when they heard the list of elements making up the ‘whole armour of God’ (deSilva 2022: 325). However, Christians in sixteenth-century Nuremberg would more likely have visualized the ‘shield of faith’ and ‘helmet of salvation’ in a heraldic format, like the fictitious coat of arms represented here in an engraving by Albrecht Dürer.
The combination of a rampant lion and crowing rooster does not identify an actual heraldic bearer; instead, this is a coat of arms for the ‘everyman’. Like the author of Ephesians, Dürer has conjured an imaginary armour that can unite communities across earthly borders under one rhetorical flourish. As a form of image that can be reproduced, prints like Dürer’s engraving needed to speak to broad audiences across geographical and cultural divides.
Similarly, Ephesians was written to instruct and encourage a wide range of people, perhaps as a circular letter. Potent metaphors such as the ‘armour of God’ are successful precisely because they are universally adaptable, speaking to individuals and communities across time and space.
As a picture, Dürer’s open-ended heraldry invites viewers to gloss the arms with their own allegorical interpretations. Perhaps the lion symbolizes Christ. The silent cockcrow on the helm could recall heraldic representations of the Arma Christi popular in Dürer’s day, reminding viewers of Peter’s denial of Christ (Hughes 2023: 505). The rooster calls us to be mindfully attentive to possible hidden messages in the composition, just as recipients of this text are urged to ‘keep alert with all perseverance’ (Ephesians 6:18) and—elsewhere in the New Testament canon—‘not [to] sleep, as others do, but [to] keep awake ... and put on the breastplate of faith and love’ (1 Thessalonians 5:6–8).
Dürer’s engraving and the New Testament’s epistles sharpen and fortify their recipients’ intellectual and spiritual strength through allegorical contemplation of imaginary arms, which may be adopted by anybody.
References
deSilva, David A. 2022. Ephesians, New Cambridge Bible Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Hughes, Frances Rothwell. 2023. ‘Thinking with Heraldry on the Eve of the Reformation: A Drawing by Niklaus Manuel Deutsch’, Art History, 46.3: 484–511
Roberto Oderisi :
The Man of Sorrows, c.1354 , Tempera and gold on panel
Cannupa Hanska Luger :
Mirror Shield Project, 2016 , Performance
Albrecht Dürer :
Coat of Arms with a Lion and a Cock, 1500–05 , Engraving
Subversive Shields of Faith
Comparative commentary by Frances Rothwell Hughes
Ephesians concludes with a stirring exhortation to remain steadfast in love, faith, and hope, using the powerful metaphor of the ‘Armour of God’. The elements of a Roman soldier’s outfit are enumerated one by one as symbols of the internal fortification that Christians might need to fend off the devil, such as the ‘breastplate of righteousness’. These are not intended for ‘flesh and blood’ battles. Instead, God fortifies faithful souls with a panoply of spiritual defences that transcend arenas of mortal combat.
The three artworks explored here all feature poetic or artful, rather than military, armour. The Greek word for ‘armour’ used in Ephesians is panoplia, from which we get the English word ‘panoply’ (Muddiman 2006: 287). The term can mean defensive weaponry, ceremonial ornaments, or a complete set of accessories.
Mirror Shield Project employs defensive arms (shields), making it most directly comparable to the martial metaphor in Ephesians. In contrast, the Arma Christi emphasizes the notion of arms as a complete set of accessories, showcasing the toolkit of Christ’s Passion and victorious Resurrection. Albrecht Dürer’s engraving represents the medieval European tradition of heraldry, in which shields and helmets were used as ornaments of honour.
The threefold connotations of armour as defensive weaponry, ornament, and toolkit are used to great metaphorical effect in Ephesians. On one level, believers are called to prepare for what sounds like a physical battle against the devil’s missiles, whilst also ‘tooling up’ for the spiritual fight through prayer. On another level, the author asks the faithful to display their faith openly, like an ornament on a shield, by declaring the word of God.
The ‘Armour of God’ metaphor equates military might with unwavering nonviolence. This subversion of armorial norms is a crucial element in all three artworks.
The visual tradition of the Arma Christi allows viewers to contemplate the abuses that Christ endured, whilst acting as a reminder that his bodily sacrifice utterly subverted the earthly dynamics of power: the tools that caused Christ’s death become his ornaments of victory.
In Dürer’s fictitious coat of arms, the paradoxical elevation of a lowly rooster above a noble lion signals that this is an open-ended heraldic design for anyone and everyone, inviting viewers to think allegorically and consider their own internal, spiritual heraldry.
Mirror Shield Project uses inversion as a method of peaceable combat, reflecting violence and authority back on itself. The glistening surfaces of the shields as they snake across the landscape pit the enduring beauty of nature and human artfulness against the utilitarian weapons of the state.
It may be tempting to seek one’s own, individual sense of comfort in the Armour of God, but the rest of Ephesians makes it clear that this is a collective armour, under which all of humanity may shelter (Muddiman 2006: 285). Mirror Shield Project is also a collaborative endeavour; Cannupa Hanska Luger created an instructional video about how to make a mirrored shield, inviting people far and wide to participate in the performance (Luger 2024). Likewise, Dürer’s armorial design transforms the elitist language of heraldry into an open-ended artwork for any viewer. Just as the author of Ephesians uses emotive rhetoric to inspire the letter’s addressees to equip themselves with the word of God, so Luger and Dürer encourage their viewers to adopt and adapt their designs, thus perpetuating the subversive, peaceful power of art.
Another temptation is to assume that the Armour of God is a special metaphor intended for a ‘chosen’ community of the faithful. But the central element of the Arma Christi, the cross of the crucifixion, is a reminder that God’s armour is even more radically inclusive than this. The cross is a universal coat of arms, which offers redemption as much to those who trust in it as to those who hammer nails into its surface. Similarly, Mirror Shield Project invites all of us to self-reflect and seek redemption for the violation of nature by humankind, even those directly assailing the activists from above.
Ephesians conveys a more apocalyptic mood than earlier Pauline letters, suggesting that the entire cosmos is locked in a spiritual war between good and evil. It may have been written after Paul's lifetime, using his epistolic authority to help soothe an anxious church (Atkins 2023: 43). In times of crisis, then and now, it is essential to remember that the Armour of God is not meant to fortify its wearers against temporal, earthly opponents, but rather against the dark ‘powers’ that seek to inhibit their love and their imaginations.
References
Atkins, Christopher S. 2023. ‘Textualizing Pauline Revelation: Self-Referentiality, Reading Practices, and Pseudepigraphy in Ephesians’, Harvard Theological Review, 116.1: 24–43
Luger, Cannupa Hanska. 2024. ‘Mirror Shield Project’, available at https://www.cannupahanska.com/social-engagement/mirror-shield-project [accessed 25 May 2024]
Muddiman, John. 2006. The Epistle to the Ephesians (London: Continuum)
Commentaries by Frances Rothwell Hughes