Haggai 1
The Command to Rebuild the Temple
Paul Neagu
Empty Hand, 1970–71, Wood and metal, 28 x 225 x 325 cm, Tate; Purchased 2000, T07752, ©️ Paul Neagu / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York; Photo: ©️ Tate, London / Art Resource, NY Image
‘You have sown much, and harvested little’
Commentary by Ruth Jackson Ravenscroft
The ‘empty hand’ in Paul Neagu’s sculpture is a wooden construction, composed of small box-like cells, joined together using metal wire, and suspended in a solid wooden frame. Some of these cells are connected in rows, evoking pigeonholes stacked up together in a post room. Weighing less than a kilogram, the sculpture is scaled close to the size of a human hand.
The way this hand has been mapped out using these box-like structures is typical of many of the sculptures, drawings, and paintings that the Romanian-born artist made from the late 1960s onwards—of ‘cellular’ hands, faces, and bodies, divided up into interchangeable compartments. And these images match Neagu’s wider philosophical vision. Drawing on sources as remarkable as mathematician Johannes Kepler (1571–1630) and Russian philosopher Pyotr Ouspenskii (1878–1947), Neagu articulated an understanding of reality according to which everything is interconnected: the part in the whole, and the whole in the part (Neagu 1974: 18). He was captivated by the idea that the human body with its interconnected cells is a microcosm, or miniature, of much bigger systems like human society, or even the universe (Radu 2022).
In Haggai 1, the prophet addresses the failure of YHWH’s people to rebuild his house following their return to Jerusalem from exile. The image of an empty hand carries connotations of loss and lack, and Neagu’s sculpture resonates with the losses of the Lord’s people in verses 4–6. These, having neglected the Lord’s house, find themselves having ‘sown much and harvested little’; they have eaten and drunk, while never feeling sated.
In the same passage, the prophet calls the people to ‘consider their ways’ (vv. 5, 7). Something is amiss; the people do not honour YHWH in the appropriate way (Foster 2020: 26–27). Neagu’s sculpture, which gestures to the interconnectedness of all things, helps the reader consider just how much these people must have lost their way, if the work of their hands—sowing, reaping, clothing, and feeding themselves—leaves them out of harmony with the world around them.
References
Foster, Robert L. 2020. The Theology of the Books of Haggai and Zechariah (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Neagu, Paul. 1974. Generative Art Group [G.A.G.], available at https://paulneagu.com/instal/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/GAG.pdf [accessed 22 October 2024]
Radu, Magda. 2024. ‘Paul Neagu: A Palpable Philosophy, August 2022’, www.independenthq.com [accessed 22 October 2024]
Phyllida Barlow
untitled: slidingupturnedhouse, 2015, Plywood, cement, plaster, bonding plaster, scrim, PVA, paint, timber & sand, 93 x 140.6 cm, British Council Collection; P8636, ©️ Phyllida Barlow Estate Courtesy the Phyllida Barlow Estate and Hauser & Wirth; Photo: Alex Delfanne
Unsettling Houses
Commentary by Simon Ravenscroft
Phyllida Barlow’s work untitled: slidingupturnedhouse rises from the ground diagonally, up through a pillar constructed from plywood, and bearing a few sweeping paint marks. On top of the pillar sits a wooden ‘house’. The surface of the pillar has a very sharp incline, however, so that when viewers walk around the sculpture, they will see how the house finds itself precariously balanced. It looks as though it is about to fall off its support.
The house itself is covered in paint marks of different colours. It is boxy in character and is sandwiched between flat slats of wood, which are likewise teetering in different directions, pulling away from each other due to the sloping surface at the centre of the work.
Barlow has written about the ‘unforgiving’ nature of sculpture: how a sculpted work is not merely an image of something else, but has its own ‘reality’. Sculptures ‘demand space’ in terms of where they can be placed, and the way they perform and express themselves in that space (Barlow & Fecteau: 2013–14). In the case of untitled: slidingupturnedhouse, the viewer might remark that the dynamic of precariousness that it produces—the way it looks as if it will fall—is unsettling. If the work evokes a house, then surely no house could function if it were so constructed?
In Haggai 1, much of the action—both human and divine—revolves around precarious, unsettled, dwelling places. The ruins of the destroyed Temple, which was the house of God, act as a prompt for YHWH to demand action from his people. It lies there broken while they ‘busy themselves’ with their own houses. YHWH will bring drought to the land of his people, destabilizing their way of life, ‘blowing away’ the little they are able to bring home, until they get to work on rebuilding it.
References
Barlow, Phyllida and Vincent Fecteau. 2013–14. ‘Phyllida Barlow and Vincent Fecteau’, BOMB 126: 48–57
Paul Neagu
Full Hand, 1970–71, Wood and copper wire, 2.8 x 22.5 x 32.5 cm, Tate; Purchased 2000, T07753, ©️ Paul Neagu / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York; Photo: ©️ Tate, London / Art Resource, NY
Palpable Art
Commentary by Ruth Jackson Ravenscroft
Paul Neagu’s Full Hand acts as a contrasting companion to his work Empty Hand. In this second sculpture, a large yet life-size hand composed of wooden cells is again encased in a sturdy wooden frame, except in this instance the cells are full blocks, as opposed to the hollow compartments of Empty Hand. The dark wood of the sculpture is grainy, and the work features some rough, uneven edges and exposed string. Each segment or cell of the hand is marked by a raised wedge, presenting an uneven surface texture.
On the human body, the hand is the part most associated with the sensation of touch, as well as with actions of shaping, moulding, working, and creating. And it was Neagu’s intent that his art should not merely be looked at, but should be open to active exploration by all of the human senses. In his ‘Palpable Art Manifesto’, released in 1969 alongside an exhibition of his work in Edinburgh, he asserted that the eye was surely losing its major role in responding to art and beauty in the world. The eye is ‘fatigued, perverted, shallow’, he wrote—its culture is ‘degraded’; it has been ‘seduced by photography, film, and television’ (Neagu 1969).
Given this ‘seduction’ and distraction of the eye, Neagu called for a reorientation of art away from a strictly visual emphasis and towards being ‘palpable’ and tangible instead. This is at the same time a call for art to be better and more fully integrated into social and cultural life.
In the text of Haggai 1, the prophet tells the people that they have busied themselves with their own concerns and turned fruitlessly away from the task of rebuilding the house of the Lord. A reorientation of their hearts and actions is needed. After YHWH declares to his people ‘I am with you’ (vv.12–13), the spirit of the people is stirred, and they go to work on the Temple. Their attention is drawn back to their God.
Neagu’s tactile sculpture prompts the reader to consider what it means to put one’s hands to work for a greater purpose, and to find them full.
References
Clayton, Eleanor. 2015. ‘Paul Neagu: Palpable Sculpture: Leeds’, The Burlington Magazine, 157.1352: 803–04
Neagu, Paul. 1969. ‘Palpable Art Manifesto!’, available at https://www.demarco-archive.ac.uk/assets/4631-p1969_document_page_14_palpable_art_manifesto_by_paul_neagup/lightbox [accessed 22 October 2024)
‘Paul Neagu interviewed by Mel Gooding, for the National Life Stories project Artists’ Lives’, 1994–95, British Library Sound & Moving Image reference, C466/27
Paul Neagu :
Empty Hand, 1970–71 , Wood and metal
Phyllida Barlow :
untitled: slidingupturnedhouse, 2015 , Plywood, cement, plaster, bonding plaster, scrim, PVA, paint, timber & sand
Paul Neagu :
Full Hand, 1970–71 , Wood and copper wire
By the Hand of the Prophet
Comparative commentary by Ruth Jackson Ravenscroft
The book of the prophet Haggai is addressed to the ‘remnant’ of God’s people living in Jerusalem, some 20 years after those forcibly displaced in the Babylonian exile were allowed to return to the languishing city (Stead 2022: 28). The word of YHWH Sabaoth—the Lord of hosts—comes to the people by the hand of the prophet; this is a written and not an oral directive. The Lord’s message is a call to action, and one that strikes awe and reverence into its audience. YHWH asks his people to consider their ways. The Temple of Jerusalem lies in ruins following its destruction over six decades earlier, and rather than put their hands to work in rebuilding it, the people are looking after their own interests, ‘dwelling in their panelled houses’ (Haggai 1:4). For this reason, God says, he has called forth a drought, so that the land around the people will wither and their labours will be fruitless upon it.
The Temple in this context was understood to be the house of the Lord, a meeting place between heaven and earth (Hundley 2013: 134; Foster 2020). ‘Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house’, the Lord commands, ‘that I may take pleasure in it, and that I may be glorified’ (v.8). In light of the drought he has sent, the people fear the Lord and recognise his authority. They are moved to obedience. The chapter closes both with a statement of commitment from God to his people—‘I am with you’, he declares (v.13)—and with the commitment of the people, in turn, to start work on the Temple.
The physicality of all three of the sculptures in this exhibition—they each have a coarse, rugged quality to them, full of gaps, protuberances, and rough edges—draws the reader’s attention to the physicality of the relationships and events described in Haggai 1.
The hand is a common focus in Paul Neagu’s art, especially the creating, drawing hand at work. And his sculptures Empty Hand and Full Hand not only feature hands as subject matter, but they also bear the marks of being hand-crafted themselves. They stimulate the viewer to consider the creative potential of their own hands as tools for working with things, and for exploring the limits of different materials—wood, string, wire. Readers of Haggai 1 who are attentive to the creative promise of their own bodies will be more deeply struck by the way the people in the text feel the souring of their relationship with YHWH in their alienation from the natural, material, and agricultural world around them. The people who have forgotten their God are hungry, thirsty, and cold, and their labour is unproductive. Their hands are failing them.
In its awkward and unruly appearance—seemingly about to fall apart—Phyllida Barlow’s sculpture likewise draws attention to the limits of materials—plywood, timber, cement, paint—and to the ability of human hands to really push such materials to their limits. Barlow has described the process of making sculpture as ‘close to chaos’; as ‘a state of never quite knowing what is going to happen and how the work should and could develop’ (Barlow & Fecteau: 2013–14: 56). The imagery here is of hands negotiating—even wrestling—with materials as a sculpture emerges, and given its unstable quality, untitled: slidingupturnedhouse appears to act as a physical monument to this ongoing process of creative and chaotic negotiation. But as Barlow points out, the reality is that it is very difficult to retain the ‘haphazard character’ of a sculpture like untitled: slidingupturnedhouse when installing it as a permanent object in a gallery space (ibid: 57). How does one preserve precariousness in permanence?
In the book of Haggai, a different kind of uncertainty and open-endedness is communicated about the construction of the Temple. The narrative in Haggai 1 ends with the people starting work to rebuild the house of the Lord, but nowhere in this particular book is there confirmation that the project was actually completed (Foster 2020: 30). In the text, we therefore encounter the people working with renewed energy toward a future yet to come, in which YHWH will remain with them, steadfastly, and the house of the Lord will have been rebuilt as his dwelling place.
References
Barlow, Phyllida and Vincent Fecteau. 2013–14. ‘Phyllida Barlow and Vincent Fecteau’, BOMB 126: 48–57
Foster, Robert L. 2020. The Theology of the Books of Haggai and Zechariah (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Hundley, Michael B. 2013. Gods in Dwellings: Temples and Divine Presence in the Ancient Near East (Atlanta: SBL)
Stead, Michael. 2022. Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi: An Introduction and Study Guide (Edinburgh: T&T Clark)
Commentaries by Ruth Jackson Ravenscroft