Genesis 15
Seeing in the Dark
Pierre Soulages
Peinture, 1959, Oil on canvas, 201.5 x 162 cm, Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf; Purchased in 1965, Inv. 157, bpk Bildagentur / Art Resource, NY
Beyond Black
Commentary by Diana Lipton
As the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram, and a deep and terrifying darkness descended upon him. (Genesis 15:12)
Pierre Soulages (1919–2022), often regarded as France’s greatest post-WWII painter, emphasized two formative influences: the prehistoric cave paintings at Lascaux he saw as a boy, and the abbey-church of Sainte-Foy de Conques where he decided to become a painter.
The cave paintings shaped Soulages’s sense of time. He rejected notions of linear progress in art and sought to return to the primal colours and powerful lines he’d seen at Lascaux. They also piqued his interest in darkness: why, he asked himself, did people enter a cave to paint?
The Romanesque church inspired the artist’s lifelong engagement with darkness and light. An early American champion of Soulages wrote of Sainte-Foy:
there, it was no dead blackness, but a live and gently palpitating dark suffused with a subtle illumination which reached its fullness in slashes of light from the high narrow windows and the soft glow where it struck the floors and walls. (Sweeney 1972: 10–11)
Years of painting with bold slashes of black, often against rich umber or white—the colours of the cave paintings and the church—led ultimately to what Soulages called ‘Outrenoir’, beyond black. By 1979, he understood that he needed no other colour.
Yet, as is clear in the painting in this exhibition, Soulages wasn’t working so much with black paint as with light. Tiny points and blades of white light flash through the darkness in the places where the brush strokes don’t quite meet.
But the real light is not shining through the darkness, it is emanating from it. The source of the gradations and distinctions is not different shades of black, or paint applied more thickly in one place than another. It is the way light plays on brush strokes and swipes of the palette knife on black paint.
We’re seeing, as it were, in the dark, as Abram did when God appeared as a flaming torch in the deep and terrifying darkness after sunset.
References
Celis, Ana Maria. 2018. ‘Post-War and Contemporary Art Evening Sale, Lot 22 C, Lot Essay’, www.Christies.com, available at https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6171880 [accessed 2 December 2024]
Johnson Sweeney, James. 1972. Pierre Soulages (New York: New York Graphic Society)
Zohar Gotesman
No Relief, 2022, Halila limestone, metal frame, pallet jack, 215 x 300 cm, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem; ©️ The Israel Museum, Jerusalem; Photo: Elie Posner
Sine Qua Non
Commentary by Diana Lipton
[Y]our offspring shall be aliens in a land that is not theirs and shall be enslaved people, and they shall be oppressed for four hundred years, but I will bring judgment on the nation that they serve, and afterward they shall come out with great possessions. (Genesis 15:13–14; own translation)
In ‘Disrupted Layer’, a 2023 exhibition at the Israel Museum of Jerusalem curated by Sally Haftel Naveh and Tamar Shavit, seven works created especially for the exhibition by artist Zohar Gotesman (b. Israel, 1979) were placed in and around the museum’s Archaeology Wing.
The first work visitors encounter is a mock Assyrian relief, resting at the entrance to the wing on a pallet jack. It’s a quotation of a seventh-century BCE relief from the ancient Mesopotamian city of Lachish, Nineveh. Created for the Palace of Sennacherib, the Assyrian king who besieged Jerusalem and subjugated Abram’s descendants, the original relief, damaged and incomplete, is on view at the British Museum.
Gotesman retains just one member of the ancient relief’s crew of enslaved people, and he ‘restores’ what Assyriologists concur was the original cargo: a lamassu, the Assyrian winged bull-human hybrid, probably destined to guard the palace gates.
The subject matter of Gotesman’s relief—an artefact on a kind of sledge being pulled by an enslaved person—is a microcosm or ‘doubling’ of his artwork in its entirety: it is an artefact on a pallet jack. His relief’s solitary enslaved person parallels the lone museum worker tasked with moving it.
But in Gotesman’s artwork the worker is absent, and in that respect it mirrors not so much the one enslaved person he retained, as the many enslaved people he eliminated from his relief, and perhaps even the missing lamassu he ‘restored’ from the original relief. Where is this object going, museum visitors ask themselves? And where is the museum worker who should be taking it there?
By spotlighting the single enslaved person pulling the lamassu, and provoking speculation about the whereabouts of the museum worker, Gotesman elevates both the lowly enslaved person over the lamassu—the mysterious object that typically commands our attention in a museum—and the typically overlooked museum worker over the artwork he (Gotesman) has made—as well as over other works like it in the museum space. For all its intrigue, it deflects our attention beyond itself, and encourages us to question the museum’s very raison d'être.
References
Borschel-Dan, Amanda. 2023. ‘Podcast: At the Israel Museum, Touring 7 New Wonders of the Ancient World, 27 January 2023’, www.timesofisrael.com, available at https://www.timesofisrael.com/podcast-at-the-israel-museum-touring-7-new-wonders-of-the-ancient-world/ [accessed 2 December 2024]
Dornith Doherty
Husk Corn (Landrace), part of the Archiving Eden project, 2008–present, Digital Chromogenic Lenticular Photograph, 104 x 105 cm; Image courtesy of Dornith Doherty
Banking on the Future
Commentary by Diana Lipton
He brought him outside and said, ‘Look toward heaven and count the stars, if you are able to count them’. Then he said to him, ‘So shall your descendants be’. (Genesis 15:14)
Biblical Hebrew applies the word zera, ‘seed’, both to human offspring, such as the descendants promised to Abram in Genesis 15, and to the reproductive units of plants.
Dornith Doherty, a Professor at the University of North Texas, uses photography, video, animations, works on paper, and scientific imaging to highlight ecological and philosophical issues arising from human interaction with the environment. Doherty thinks about how, at a time of climate crisis and threatened biodiversity, we can protect nature in the far future. Archiving Eden is an ongoing collaborative project in which she creates images of seed banks and the seeds they preserve. Using X-ray equipment intended to assess viability, Doherty documents and collages seeds and tissue samples from all around the globe. The magnified images of forms invisible to the naked eye inspire awe, she says, in the power of tiny plantlets and seeds to survive for as long as two hundred years with the capacity to generate new life.
In the work shown here, Doherty used lenticular animation, a technology that employs special lenses to produce images that seem to change or move when viewed from different angles. This digital collage of domesticated varieties of husk corn shifts through green, yellow, and brown as viewers pass by, mimicking changes in seeds as they are dried for preservation.
These still photographs whose colours change as they are looked at by viewers allow Doherty to preserve a single moment in these seeds’ lives while at the same time suggesting nature’s ongoing processes. Preservation and process: there is an echo here of the goal of the seed banks, as scientists preserve seeds from the relentless depredations of human activity, not so much to stop time as to shape its course; to point to potential future transformations in the lives of these seeds.
In some cases, the banks and the people who built and maintain them inspire as much awe as the seeds themselves. In St Petersburg during the Second World War, a group of scientists starved to death to safeguard seeds they could otherwise have eaten, for the sake of a future they hoped in. Doherty’s photographs put us in touch with a hope like theirs—and perhaps like Abram’s.
Pierre Soulages :
Peinture, 1959 , Oil on canvas
Zohar Gotesman :
No Relief, 2022 , Halila limestone, metal frame, pallet jack
Dornith Doherty :
Husk Corn (Landrace), part of the Archiving Eden project, 2008–present , Digital Chromogenic Lenticular Photograph
Unseen Multitudes
Comparative commentary by Diana Lipton
The three artworks in this exhibition draw attention to three features of Genesis 15, in which Abram (later Abraham) laments his lack of an heir; cuts a covenant with God; and receives a divine assurance about the promised land.
Dornith Doherty’s Husk Corn (Landrace), from Archiving Eden (2008 to present) highlights the fourfold occurrence of the Hebrew word zera, ‘seed’: Abram complains that since he has no ‘seed’ (offspring), his servant will be his heir (v.3); God promises Abram that his ‘seed’ (descendants) will be as numerous as the stars of heaven (v.5); God warns him that his ‘seed’ (offspring), will be enslaved (v.13); and finally, God promises to give Abram’s ‘seed’ (descendants) the land of Canaan (v.14).
One issue raised by Doherty’s multi-year global project to photograph seed banks and create artistic representations of the seeds they preserve is selection. Some seed banks are built but later compromised by war or unanticipated climate conditions. Some countries and geographic regions lack the desire or the wherewithal to build seed banks in the first place. In both cases, their seeds will not be preserved for future generations. What about Abram’s seed? He did, of course, go on to have sons of his own: one with Hagar (Genesis 16:15); one with Sarah (Genesis 21:2); and six with Keturah (Genesis 25:1–4). Did Abram just happen not to have daughters? Or did he perhaps have daughters who, since they did not count as heirs, were not worth documenting for posterity? And if the latter is true, should we (do we?) visualize men and women when we read in Genesis 15 about the ‘seed’ of Abram who will be enslaved and then owners of the land of Canaan? Or are women never really ‘seed’ in the Bible?
Pierre Soulages’s black painting sheds light on the role of darkness in Genesis 15, in which Abram experiences a mahazeh, vision. Though not a dream, halom, it’s surely a ‘vision of the night’. God tells Abram to go outside and count the stars; a ‘great darkness’ (the dead of night, or a psycho-spiritual event, or both) falls on Abram; and ‘after the sun had set’, God appears in the form of a smoking oven and a flaming torch.
Why is Genesis 15 so emphatic about darkness? Abram built his first altar by the oak at Moreh (Genesis 12:6–7), and later, God appeared to him ‘by the oaks of Mamre in the heat of the day’ (Genesis 18:1). The Akedah, the near-sacrifice of Isaac, took place on a mountain, Mount Moriah (Genesis 22:1–19). It’s easy to understand why proximity to trees or great height mark biblical locations as special, even sacred. Both deep shade in hot sun and spectacular views induce a sense of awe.
But darkness can also make a space seem spiritually significant. Geographic markers vanish, creating a feeling of infinity. Familiar objects look mysterious. In the dark, we fear the unknown, the unseen. And, above all, the line between heaven and earth dissolves in the blackness. The depth, texture, and play of light and dark in Soulages’s black-on-black painting, especially bearing in mind the caves and the abbey-cathedral that influenced the artist, helped me see how darkness shapes the sacred space of Genesis 15, a text I thought I knew well but hadn’t previously read in the dark.
Zohar Gotesman’s No Relief spotlights references to enslavement in Genesis 15. With its reassurance that Abram will have an heir, and its promise of a land for his multiple descendants, this chapter is overwhelmingly positive. But embedded within it is the ominous threat of four hundred years of captivity (v.13). In the ancient Near East and beyond, slavery erased identity. An enslaved person was no longer the son of his father, but his master’s son. In this very chapter, Abram describes the enslaved man under his control as the ‘son of my house’ (v.3). Enslaved people are often discussed en masse. They are part of their ancestor’s projected history, as in this chapter, but for the most part, they have no stories of their own to pass to their descendants. ‘Our forefathers were slaves in Egypt’ (Passover Haggadah)—that’s about it. The lives of these enslaved people are not demarcated by lifecycle rituals. Unlike Abram, they will not be buried with their ancestors at a ripe old age.
For me, Gotesman’s isolation of one enslaved person from a larger group serves as a model for recovering the individual identities of the people mentioned in Genesis 15. Abram was one and his descendants were many. That’s the message of this chapter. But I choose to foreground a single person—moreover a worker, like Gotesman’s enslaved, rope-tugging labourer—and to tell myself her story.
Commentaries by Diana Lipton